This page (revision-69) was last changed on 26-Nov-2021 10:22 by kparrott

This page was created on 26-Nov-2021 10:22 by JLawler

Only authorized users are allowed to rename pages.

Only authorized users are allowed to delete pages.

Page revision history

Version Date Modified Size Author Changes ... Change note
69 26-Nov-2021 10:22 9 KB kparrott to previous
68 26-Nov-2021 10:22 9 KB jmyers to previous | to last APPROVAL_WIP_REC ==> APPROVAL_WIP_REC(System_Preference)
67 26-Nov-2021 10:22 9 KB JEscott to previous | to last
66 26-Nov-2021 10:22 9 KB JEscott to previous | to last
65 26-Nov-2021 10:22 9 KB JEscott to previous | to last
64 26-Nov-2021 10:22 9 KB JEscott to previous | to last
63 26-Nov-2021 10:22 9 KB JEscott to previous | to last
62 26-Nov-2021 10:22 9 KB JMyers to previous | to last
61 26-Nov-2021 10:22 9 KB JMyers to previous | to last

Page References

Incoming links Outgoing links
APPROVAL PROCESS
APPROVAL PROCESS

Version management

Difference between version and

At line 5 changed one line
Approvals may be done in Personality or Self Service, by managers and/or administrators. Supervisors who log into the Manager Self-Service module can view and approve transactions initiated by their employees. Administrators who log into Personality or HR Self Service can view and approve transactions initiated by the employees they are authorized for.
Approvals may be done in [{$applicationname}] or Self Service, by managers and/or administrators. Supervisors who log into the Manager Self-Service module can view and approve transactions initiated by their employees. Administrators who log into [{$applicationname}] or HR Self Service can view and approve transactions initiated by the employees they are authorized for.
At line 10 changed one line
||Benefit Elections| Approval of benefits selected on the Personality or Self Service election forms is done on [IBEL] or WxDAR.
||Benefit Elections| Approval of benefits selected on the [{$applicationname}] or Self Service election forms is done on [IBEL] or WxDAR.
At line 13 added one line
||Classes| Approval of training classes is done on [ICRSC].
At line 17 removed one line
||Education| Approval of Candidates Education can be done in [IRCA] within the Education tab.
At line 26 removed one line
||References| Approval of Candidates References is done in [IRCA] within the References tab.
At line 28 removed one line
||Time Sheet Entries (Authorize)|Approval/Authorization of time sheet entries may be done in [WVPATC].
At line 30 changed one line
||Work History| Approval of Candidates Work History is done in [IRCA] within the Work History tab.
At line 38 changed one line
For example, if there is a special set of approval rules for wage changes, an approval process may be defined with a 'Personnel Action' approval type and a where clause that restricts the process to PA’s that have a change reason of “A WAGE INCREASE”. All other types of PA’s would not qualify.
For example, if there is a special set of approval rules for wage changes, a Personnel Action type approval process can be set up with a where clause that restricts the process to PA’s that have a change reason of “A WAGE INCREASE”. All other types of PA’s would not qualify. For more information on using where clauses in an approval process please read the page [Using Where Clauses in Approvals|WHERE CLAUSES IN APPROVALS].
At line 40 removed 2 lines
%%information For more information on using where clauses in an approval process please read the [Using Where Clauses in Approvals|WHERE CLAUSES IN APPROVALS] page.%%
At line 44 changed one line
A priority may be specified to indicate the order in which the approval processes are checked. The priority will be used when the approval service is deciding which process applies to the approval entity. Processes are grouped by type and ordered from highest to lowest.
A priority may be specified to indicate the order that the approval processes are checked. The priority will be used when the approval service is deciding which process applies to the approval entity. Processes are grouped by type and ordered from highest to lowest. Caution should be used since if left empty the ID value will be substituted. This may cause unexpected results if one of many is left empty. The suggested set up is to define a priority when multiple of the same type exist.
At line 46 changed one line
%%warning Caution should be used since if left empty, the ID value will be substituted, which may cause unexpected results if there are multiple occurrences of the same approval type. The suggested set up is to define a priority when multiple of the same type exist.%%
Approval processes can also be defined using a start date and/or an end date where the rules are considered to be “effective”. If the current processing as of date falls within the time frame specified (or after the start if the end date is not provided or before the end date if the start date is not provided) the approval is considered effective.
At line 48 removed 2 lines
Approval processes can also be defined using a start date and/or end date where the rules are considered to be effective. If the current processing "as of" date falls within the time frame specified (or after the start if the end date is not provided or before the end date if the start date is not provided) the approval is considered effective.
At line 53 changed one line
To get the best performance, processing should begin with the most specific approval processes that affects the smallest group of employees and finish with the most general approval process that will process all remaining employees (the largest group).
To get the best performance, processing should begin with the most specific (smallest) group of employees and finish with the least specific (largest) group. High priority numbers are processed first. Therefore, you want to process the most specific (smallest) Approval Process first and end with a general Approval Process that will process all remaining employees.
At line 59 changed one line
Example: You have a situation where Department A has a different benefit election approval process than the rest of the company. If you set the priority for Department A’s approval process to be prepared after the approval process for the rest of the company, then all employees in Department A will be processed as part of the whole company and will never be processed as Department A. However, if you set the priority to process Department A first, they will be processed correctly, eliminated from further processing, and then the rest of the company will be processed as required.
Example: You have a situation where Department A has a different benefit election approval process than the rest of the company. If you set the priority for Department A’s approval process to be processed after the approval process for the rest of the company, then all employees in Department A will be processed as part of the whole company and will never be processed as Department A. However, if you set the priority to process Department A first, they will be processed correctly, eliminated from further processing, and then the rest of the company will be processed as required.
At line 61 changed one line
%%information No employee in the organization will ever be processed twice for the same approval type. Once someone has qualified they are excluded from further processing.%%
No employee in the organization will ever be processed twice for the same approval type. Once someone has qualified they are excluded from further processing.
At line 64 changed one line
Within Personnel Actions approval type, there are many PA sub-types and within each PA sub-type there can be many approval processes.
Within the Approval Type of Personnel Actions there are many PA types and within each PA type there can be many approval processes.
At line 66 changed one line
Each approval process within each PA sub-type will need to follow a specific processing priority, so they can be broken down into individual series.
Each approval process within each PA type will need to follow a specific processing priority, so they can be broken down into individual series.
At line 69 changed 4 lines
|4000 Series|[WEBEL]|Benefit Election Requests
|3000 Series|[WEEPP]|Personal Profile Change Requests
|2000 Series|[WMEPR]|Promotion Requests
|1000 Series|[WMETR]|Termination Requests
\\4000 Series: WEBEL Benefit Election Requests
\\3000 Series: WEEPP Personal Profile Change Requests
\\2000 Series: WMEPR Promotion Requests
\\1000 Series: WMETR Termination Requests
At line 79 changed one line
For each process, multiple [steps|APPROVAL STEPS] or at least a minimum of one step must be defined, sequenced and given a description. For each step, [approvers|APPROVERS] and approval records may be maintained and viewed.
For each process, multiple [steps|APPROVAL STEPS] or at a minimum of one step must be defined, sequenced and given a description. For each step, [approvers|APPROVERS] and approval records may be maintained and viewed.
At line 81 changed 2 lines
!Approval Workflow Notification
Approval Records are used in several ways to compliment the approval system. One of the usages is Workflow, which is provided on the table [P2K_CM_APPROVAL_RECORDS].
!Approvers
At line 84 changed one line
This enhances approvals by adding all standard features of workfflow such as emails, user calcs and in turn procedures.
[Approvers|APPROVERS] are defined by making a selection from the [Approver type|X_APPROVER_TYPE]lexicon.
At line 86 changed one line
The term “Notification Records” has been used to describe the records created to “notify” an approver, say for example an assignment manager of a pending approval via email using workflow. If on step one an approver is required to make an approval. Once the approval entities stage is set to Stage_waiting_approval, an approval record or notification record is created. This record has a status of “Ready to be Approved” as defined in the lexicon [X_APPROVAL_STATUS]. 'Up To' approvers also get a notification record with the status of “Approval In Progress”
!Designated Approvers
Approvers may be replaced by a designated approver for a defined time frame or indefinitely for specific approval types known as Designated Approvers in [IEMDA]. Approvers may also maintain who is designated as an approver in their absence using [IEDA].
Approvers may designate a temporary replacement in two capacities. Either a “Replacement” or an “Alternate” may be defined. Replacement designates relieve an approver of all approval responsibilities starting as of the “From date” and end on the “To date” starting at 12am on the date specified. If these dates are left blank (null) the beginning of time and end of time are assumed respectively. When an alternate is defined all responsibilities are shared by the specified person and the original approver.
At line 84 added 107 lines
Both types of replacements may be specific to a certain type of approval.
Ex: a Manager may be away for a vacation and time sheets may need to be reviewed during that time frame so an alternate or replacement may be assigned specifically to “Time Sheets”. If there was a salary review during that time, it would remain the responsibility of the original manager to approve.
When responsibility is transferred from the approver to the designate for a replacement, all approval records previously created for notification are moved from the approver to the designate when the new designate record is saved. This will cause work flow, all approver screens and self service splash “to do” lists to now be full for the existing approvals previously required for the approver. Any new approvals required will create new approval records for the designate and the original approver will not be notified.
Alternate designates will have a copy of the approval records created for them and the original approver will retain all existing approval records. Both the alternate and approver will receive notification of new pending approvals.
The maintenance of the approval records as described above will be limited to the specified approval types. If none are listed all approval records will be subject to this maintenance.
!Approval Process And Approver Where Clauses
A where clause may be defined in [IMWC] or [IMDAO].
Once a where clause is defined it may be used to control what gets approved and by whom when using it at two levels. The first is by the approval process itself and the second is by each approver. In both cases the where clause must be relative to the approval entity as the base table.
Example:
Personnel Action where clause:
This condition is attempting to restrict to a position code. In order to do that the condition must start from a column on [p2k_sa_personnel_actions]. This example works its way from [p2k_sa_personnel_actions] then to the prime assignment on [p2k_hr_assignments] ,then to the effective details of that assignment ([p2k_hr_assignment_details]), then to the position ([p2k_cm_positions]) on that assignment as noted from the foreign keys in the condition column. The “value” is the restricted position code.
!Approval User Interfaces
Approvals may be made using 2 different types of interfaces. The most common interface is the approval bar and the second is the approval action button. The approval bar is a graphical representation with added features to see the state of the approval process. The approval button simply makes an approval with available optional comments.
__Approval Bar__
The approval bar is divided into sections which represent each step in the process. The description of each step is displayed in bold to identify the step. Below the description is 1 approval record status used to describe that status of that step. In the example above an approval has been made on step 1 by the department manager and step 2 is ready to be approved by the HR personnel approver. To help show the status of each step is 2 chevrons colored green and red. Green notes an approval has been made and red notes a step waiting approval.
Each step has two methods of making an approval. The first is the quick approve, noted as a check mark on the step which the approver (user) has rights to approve. If the user is not an approver with rights to approve the quick approve is not available. When the quick approve is clicked an approval is made and the process is progressed to the next step or final approval as required. An option to make comments is not available.
The second is a menu available with a right mouse click over the waiting step. The first menu item is a text item showing the approver name. The three options following that are approve, decline and send back with comments.
The approve action on the menu provides an option to add comment to the approval via a dialog.
The dialog has an optional comment box and approve or cancel action buttons. The approve will advance the process to the next step or make the final approval as required.
The approval bar menu also provides the same type of dialog for Decline with comments and Send back with comments.
The last part of the approval bar is the information icon located to the immediate right of the approval bar. When clicked this action displays a view only dialog showing a record representation of the existing state of the approval proceeds based on the current approval records. Details shown include Date and time of the approval record creation, Step sequence, Status of the approval record, Approver Type, The identity for which the approval record was created, and optional comments made by an approver. These details may be viewed with more detail by day in [DDAPR] (see the Approval Screens section below) This dialog is based on the form (function)[MDAPR].
__Approval Action Button__
The second type of interface is simply an action button located on various forms. The approval screens list below includes the type of action GUI provided.
\\
----
!!Approval Records
Approval Records contain such information as the Approval timestamp, the Status of the approval and the reference ID the approval is for.
When an approval Entity becomes eligible for approval, “Notification approval records” are created. These are approval records with the approval status of “Ready for Approval”. There is one record for each identity defined as an [approver|APPROVERS] for the first step of approval. These records in conjunction with work flow can be used to notify [approvers|APPROVERS] of pending approvals.
Each stage dictates what approval records are created. The Approval records are what is used to create a visual (approval bar) or report ( discoverer) to show where and who the approval sits, whether it`s before during or after the approval.
The current supported approval record statuses are:
*Approval Cancelled
*Future Approval
*Ready To Be Approved
*Approval In Progress
*Approved
*Sent Back
*Approved Sent Back
*Approved Historic
*Declined
*Declined Historic
;Approval Cancelled:used when an entity is cancelled or deleted. All existing approval records will receive this status. (explained in a following section)
;Future Approval:used for up and coming approvals to be made for an approver who do not have upto approval. \\ \\ Approval Stages which cause this are Stage_WorkInProcess or Stage_WaitingApproval.\\ \\For the Stage_WorkInProcess futural Approvals are optional and can be controlled but a site preference defined in IMST.\\ \\Each table where approvers need as much time a possible before the actual approval is required may be defined. in the example screen shot below.\\ \\Future approval records will be created when either a Time sheet or Personnel Action is set to a WIP status.\\ \\Example: This may be helpful for managers with employees that have time sheets which have not been submitted for approval.
;Ready To Be Approved:used for approvers which are required to make approval decisions.
;Approval In Progress:used to show approvers with `Up To approval` that there is an approval in progress which they can make an up to approval on.
;Approved:used to show a positive approval
;Sent Back:used to show the approval process has been requested to start over.
;Approved Sent Back:used to show a lower step positive approval has been send back to be re-done.
;Approval Historic:used to show and entity has had a positive approval but is no longer needed either through a cancel or deletion.
;Declined:used to show a negative approval.
;Declined Historic:used to show a negative approval was made and is no longer needed either though a cancel or deletion.
Once an approval is made (for example a time sheet) an approval record is created for that identity with the appropriate status (approved, not approved, cancelled). At this time the old “notification records” are removed and notification records are created for the next step.
The next step will be determined by a couple of factors.
#The current step and its next defined step.
#the step that the approver identity is part of and if that identity is an up to approver.
#If there are any more steps in the process.
Maintenance of approval records is accomplished in three ways. The first is automatically by the system when an existing IDAP definition pre-exists to an approval process starting and does not change during the approval. Secondly a manual button is on IDAP to update records if the approval process has been updated in any way with approvals in progress.
The third is to run an update process UDAP. This process is suggested to be scheduled daily to allow start and end dates to be respected in IDAP processes or approvers, where clauses or designate approvers.
!Final Approval
Is a term used to describe any approval process that is in progress which has an approval made where it is deemed the last approval required for the process. This is possible for example in cases of missing approvers or an approval on the last step. Once final approval is made, the approval entity is updated to the “approved” stage
!Approval Work Flow Notification
Approval Records are used in several ways to compliment the approval system. One of the usages is Work Flow. Work flow is provided on the table p2k_cm_approval_records.
This enhances approvals by adding all standard features of work flow such as emails, user calcs and in turn procedures.
The term “Notification records” has been used to describe the records created to “notify” an approver, say for example an assignment manager of a pending approval via email using work flow. If on step one an approver is required to make an approval. Once the approval entities stage is set to Stage_waiting_approval, an approval record or notification record is created. This record has a status of “Ready to be Approved” as defined in the lexicon X_APPROVAL_STATUS. Up to Approvers also get a notification record with the status of “Approval In Progress”
At line 89 changed one line
Since approval records are used in a few ways to notify approver of pending approvals like screens and workflow, approval records are maintained in cases where the approval entity is deleted or cancelled. The approval record status is updated to cancelled and will have a comment made if deleted.
Since approval records are used in a few ways to notify approver of pending approvals like screens (SS) and work flow, approval records are maintained in cases where the approval entity is deleted or cancelled. The approval record status is updated to cancelled and will have a comment made if deleted.
At line 198 added 95 lines
\\
----
\\
!!OVERVIEW
!!Approval Screens
Approval screens include different types to define, view, maintain and approve. This is possible in both eP and Self service. Some of the main driving screens are listed below for eP. Self service has specific notation to the function name as WV???? and are located on several menus but generally in administrator or manager type roles.
!Define Approval Process - ([IDAP])
Used to create approval processes, steps, approvers and to view approval records.
!View Pending Approval Records - ([IDVAP])
Used to View approval records which are “ready to be approved” indicating an approval process waiting approval. This will show all the identities for each step which could actually make the approval.
!View All Approval Records - ([IDVAR])
Used to view approval details and approve if the user has approval rights. This function is dynamic and displays different details specific to the approval entity. The example below is for a personnel action.
!View Approval Records - ([DDAPR])
Details of approvals and notifications may be viewed by day.
The [Approval Bar and Approval Action Button Functions|APPROVAL BAR AND BUTTON FUNCTIONS] page provides a list of the functions with either an approval bar or approval action button.
!!DEFAULT FUNCTIONALITY
!Empty Approvers
When an approval process has been initiated each step is displayed in the approval bar which is visible in certain approval screens. Approvers who qualify for approval by the where clause will be notified of a pending approval to be made. After such approval the next step is assessed for the current approvers. If the next step is lacking approvers from either an empty definition or the defined approver is disqualified via a where clause that empty step is ignored.
When a step is ignored it will not show in the approval bar or have approval notification records created. It will appear as if the approval process did not have that step defined. When the empty step is the last step in the process the last approval made will be considered final approval and the approval entity will be updated to the “approved” stage.
Example: Approval Process – Where clause = PEAS Personnel Actions only.
*Step 1, Approver = Department Manager (no where clause)
*Step 2 , Approver = HR personnel Specific person ( Where Clause – where wage Scale/Step is the last step sequence 3)
*The assignment manager creates a new Personnel Action for a salary increase in PEAS for a salary increase to the next step. (2 of 3)
Notice only 1 step is displayed and the approval process includes two steps.
The approver where clause disqualifies the last approver.
Approval by the Department manager will result in final approval and the personnel action will become available for processing.
!Approver Options
Approvers may be defined with fours options. These options are “up to approval”, “allow send back”, “allow decline” and “allow change”. Only applies to a second level of approval or higher. Once that level of approval is reached the approver will be notified of the pending approval. At that time the approver now has three possible actions to make.
__Up to Approval__
When Up to Approval is checked that approver is eligible to approve entities which they qualify for via the where clause, including entities that are waiting approval on a step with a lower sequence. When up to approval is granted “notification records (approval records)” will be created with a status of “Approval In Progress” (Notification records are discussed further in Approval Notification /Workflow).
__Allow Send Back__
This setting applies to a second level of approval or higher. If at the time of approval the approver does not like what they see the option to send the entity back to the beginning of the approval process is available. This will set all previous step approvals (approval records) to have a status of “Approval Sent Back” which will cause the first step approvers to be notified (via new approval records) to once again approve the entity. Comments as to why the send back was made may be entered if necessary.
This option is available in eP as an option in the right mouse click menu over the appropriate step on the approval bar.
__Allow Decline__
This setting allows the approver to decline the approval entity. The option is applicable to all steps the approver is responsible for. If a decline is made the approval process is complete, no further approval notification is necessary. This option is available in the right mouse click menu. Comments as to why the decline was made may be entered if necessary.
__Allow Change__
This setting will cause the approval entity to be editable or not during the approval. In cases where the approver is allowed to view only while making the approval.
Change is allowed.
Notice the updateable details of the PA:
Change is NOT allowed.
Notice the non-updateable details of the PA:
Once an approval entity has entered the approval stage (explained below) of "Stage_WaitingApproval" CRUD will be controlled to the appropriate approver. This means that only approvers who have rights to approve on the current step with "allow change" rights will be able to edit the information displayed.
!Approval Stages
Approval Entities are managed by stages. Simplified for example - “before”, “during” and “after”. Each stage is mapped for each approval entity. This enables each entity to manage them selves to their specific business status descriptions. These are lexicon columns on the entity which describe their status or authorization requirements. The personnel actions mapping is given as an example below. For this example the “before” is stage_WorkInProcess, “during” is Stage_WaitingApproval and “after” is either “Stage_approved”, “Stage_Not_approved” or “Stage_Cancelled”
Personnel Actions – PA Status mappings translating from pa_status to approval stage.
|Pending |Stage_WorkInProcess
|In Progress| Stage_WaitingApproval
|Submitted |Stage_WaitingApproval
|Failed Update| Stage_Approved
|Approved |Stage_Approved
|Completed |Stage_Approved
|Not Approved| Stage_Not_Approved
|Tracked Copy| Stage_Cancelled
|Cancelled| Stage_Cancelled
Personnel Actions – PA Status mappings translating from approval stage to pa_status
|Stage_WorkInProcess| Pending
|Stage_Not_Approved| Not Approved
|Stage_Cancelled| Cancelled
|Stage_WaitingApproval| In Progress
|Stage_Approved| Approved
!Generic Approvals
It is not necessary to always define an approval processes. When simply a sanity check of the data is required and anyone or everyone is required to review the data on the approval entity before it moves to the next status value, generic approvals may be used.
If an approval entity is moved to the approval stage “Stage_WaitingApproval” and there has not been an approval process defined a generic 1 step approval bar will be displayed. Any user with access to the function and data may approve this type of approval. No approval records are ever created. The status of the approval entity is simply updated to the next stage upon approval.
A generic approval would be displayed as below with the right mouse click menu:
At line 97 changed one line
This section has been replaced with the site preference described below.
This section has been replaced with the site preference described below available in 4.09
At line 99 changed one line
Two Self Service screens listed below have a toggle available for use located in the find block of each function. This toggle enables the data listed in the find block to change dynamically to show “potential” approvals verses “actual” approvals.
Two self service screens listed below have a toggle available for use located in the find block of each function. This toggle enables the data listed in the find block to change dynamically to show “potential” approvals verses “actual” approvals.
At line 101 changed 2 lines
|[WVDATS]|Approve Time
|[WVTSH]|Approve Employee Time and Exceptions
|WVDATS|Approve Time
|WVTSH|Approve Employee Time and Exceptions
At line 108 changed one line
The site preference [APPROVAL_WIP_REC(System_Preference)] now replaces the old simulation logic applied when trying to find the possible approvals an approver may need to make. This logic gives more of an accurate view of the up and coming approvals by monitoring specific tables defined by this preference.
The site preference APPROVAL_WIP_REC now replaces the old simulation logic applied when trying to find the possible approvals an approver may need to make. This logic gives more of an accurate view of the up and coming approvals by monitoring specific tables defined by this preference.
At line 110 changed one line
In [IMST], preference records may be added for table aliases, such as PTS.
In IMST, preference records may be added as in the above example for table TIME
At line 310 added 2 lines
[{If var='loginstatus' contains 'authenticated'
At line 113 changed 2 lines
![Notes|Edit:Internal.APPROVAL+PROCESS]
[{InsertPage page='Internal.APPROVAL+PROCESS' default='Click to create a new notes page'}]
![Discussion|Edit:Internal.APPROVAL+PROCESS]
[{InsertPage page='Internal.APPROVAL+PROCESS' default='Click to create a new discussion page'}]
At line 316 added one line
}]
This page (revision-69) was last changed on 26-Nov-2021 10:22 by kparrottTop